We turn building surveys into a connected basis for renovation. Specialist AI agents help reconstruct the existing building and develop the proposal, reducing repeated drawing, counting and coordination work.
Measurements and documents retain their provenance. Observations, interpretations and uncertainty stay distinct.
Conceptual diagram · no building model
Evidence → Alternatives → DecisionsReal projects · public snapshots dated 26 October 2026
Scan to BIM / For technical practices
From points to IFC objects.
Registration, local reconstruction, native objects and source comparisons. Explore the scanner-to-model process through the Casa del Forno stairs, metal railings, glazed entrance and timber beams, then follow the multidisciplinary work at Casa del Noce.
Start with the surveyed village. Then enter the Casa del Noce architectural study. These public snapshots were released on 26 October 2026, with separate existing and proposed states. More recent technical work is explained below.
EXISTINGInteractive IFC-derived view
The 3D view opens as you reach this section.
A building is part of a place.
Explore the released reconstruction of the surveyed Chiappella area: homes, outbuildings, ground and connections. Isolate a building, hide coverings or cut horizontally to read its spaces.
Public snapshots · 26 October 2026 · Each published view identifies its source revision. Survey coverage and reconstruction are still being checked; unobserved details and hidden structures remain unresolved. This is a public geometry derivative, not the editable IFC or the complete technical dossier. Textures are illustrative; material and source uncertainty is identified in element details.
Authorised interiors are included. Third-party private interiors and unresolved interior ownership are excluded from the downloadable geometry. Exterior envelopes remain separate.
Casa del Noce / Across disciplines
One building. Connected systems.
Architecture, structure and services meet in the same project. Select a discipline to see the work, its current evidence and the checks still needed. The public geometry remains the architectural release dated 26 October 2026.
Public architectural snapshot · 26 October 2026
Architecture
The surveyed shell supports a proposed arrangement of spaces, openings, levels and essential furniture. Existing fabric and new design remain distinguishable. The published view contains 242 display objects; this is its export scope, not a count of every component in the current technical project.
What the review checks
Inspect circulation, openings, clear heights and the relation between retained and proposed elements. Reconcile each change with the survey and planning constraints.
Technical work status reviewed on 3 November 2026. The browser model is a selected public derivative; recent private-model contributions and specialist review do not appear automatically. We can agree an appropriate technical model review package with interested technical professionals.
Why work this way
Less repetition. More decisions.
The opportunity is to reduce the work between a survey, a model and a buildable proposal. Select a change to see where time and cost can be saved.
Connected workflowIFC
One changeUpdate the measured element
01Connected geometry
02Updated views
03Traceable evidence
Conceptual diagram · outputs depend on the commission
From scan to BIM
A measurement is clarified.
With separate files
Separate drawings and notes need to be reconciled each time a measurement changes.
With a connected model
The wall, its openings and the related views share one geometric reference. The correction can be checked once, then carried into the next deliverables.
Less repeated reconstruction
AI assists the interpretation; measured dimensions, continuity and uncertain areas still need review.
A shorter path, measured honestly.
Actual savings depend on source quality, building complexity, required detail and review. We define the scope with you and compare effort and deliverables for that scope; no universal percentage is promised.
01 / From evidence to choices
One base. Comparable choices.
The observed building keeps its history. Design alternatives change what we propose, with their own assumptions and reviews.
Existing state
Understand what is there.
Walls, openings, levels, ground and observed supports. Every gap in the evidence stays visible.
Measured
Attributed
Unresolved
Proposed design
Compare what could change.
Editable spaces, coordinated structures and services. Each alternative has its own geometry, quantities and costs.
Parameters
Alternatives
Review
Reviewing a proposal does not adopt it. A public view follows a separate authorised release.
02 / The full picture
Expertise across the lifecycle.
Four entry points into the method. Open each area for technical detail; scope and technical detail are agreed for each project.
01
Survey & shared model
Read the building, with its irregularities and unknowns.
Explore this area
From sources to spaces
Point clouds, photographs, historical drawings and field measurements inform continuous walls, openings and rooms. Unobserved portions remain explicit.
Ground, levels and supports
Survey coverage includes the building perimeter, ground contact, thresholds and interior levels. A visible floor surface does not prove its thickness, hidden foundations or structural capacity.
Objects with a history
Native IFC identities, properties and semantic relationships connect spaces, materials, source evidence and specialist findings. Measured facts and attributed observations retain their different evidence types.
02
Design & structures
Explore alternatives without losing their dependencies.
Explore this area
Editable proposed design
Partitions, floor levels and roof geometry follow explicit parameters and dependencies in native IFC. An ordinary local edit regenerates the affected elements; a display mesh alone does not establish editability.
Separate design alternatives
When commissioned, alternatives preserve their own geometry, scope, quantities and budgets. Comparing or selecting an alternative for review does not adopt it; missing calculations and costs remain unresolved.
A coordinated structural system
Materials, foundations, walls, frames, floors, roofs and their connections require evidence and competent assessment. Planning constraints and specialist conclusions must be checked again when the design changes.
03
Services, people & territory
Connect technical systems to how a place is lived in.
Explore this area
Coordinated building services
Heating, water, electrical systems, photovoltaics, automation and sensing interact with the spaces and structure. Device and data requirements retain their privacy and security checks.
Comfort and building life
Interiors, light, acoustics, accessibility, health, durability and maintenance belong to the same project. Fire and emergency requirements retain their specific professional and regulatory review.
The surrounding territory
Site context includes vegetation, geology, water, rainfall and environmental risks within the commissioned scope. A territorial study does not automatically expand a building-only design.
04
Feasibility & reviewed delivery
Make decisions, quantities and deliverables inspectable.
Explore this area
Quantities and costs
Takeoffs and cost scenarios belong to identifiable elements and a specific design revision. Alternative projects are compared separately, with retained materials, new purchases and missing estimates distinguished.
Review with responsibility
Independent geometry checks, specialist findings and legal questions return to their responsible owners. The review identifies what has been checked and what still needs a decision.
The right public derivative
Drawings, technical dossiers, visual appearance, renders and interactive views have different purposes. Public models use only authorised geometry with private content excluded, and retain clear revision and source-state labels.
03 / Connected expertise
Different disciplines. Shared intelligence.
Browse the ten decades horizontally. Choose a decade to explore its numbered agents, with technical, visual and legal contributions together.
Proposed organisation · the numbered catalogue follows the latest reorganisation plan. Contributions are planned; this view does not confirm operational activation.
00–09 · Choose a decade
Decade 01
Existing building
From historical sources and measurements to a documented existing-state model.
Our homes · this decade’s work
From method to a real home.
Casa del NoceDiscipline-specific 3D view in preparation
This dedicated discipline view will be available after completion and review of its scope. Current public overview snapshots are presented on the Skill BIM overview.
Views to prepare
Measured existing building
Documented reconstruction
Only models of our own homes, with clear revision and deliverable status. Generic examples do not substitute for the real work.
Evidence, quantities, design alternatives and cost scenarios support building and energy investment planning. Business connects the technical work to the funding strategy and application dossier.
For design practices, survey professionals and property owners: start with a defined scope, agree the deliverables and review the result together. Our collaboration programme grows from real case studies.
